Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 201/2020

Case between Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi vs Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months 21 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by the 1st defendant for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the plaintiff. The court considered the petition under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the 1st defendant was allowed by the court. No costs were ordered due to the nature of the petition.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the 1st defendant was allowed by the court. No costs were ordered due to the nature of the petition.
Key Reasoning:
The court exercised its discretionary power under Section 151 of the CPC to allow the petition, as it was necessary to prevent irreparable loss and injury to the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Thus, this power can be invoked to do all things necessary to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of its process. As per Sec. 151 of the Code it is given discretionary power to the court to allow the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. Considering the nature of the petition, there is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Prsanth B L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. R.Bahuleyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reshmi S Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition for a permanent prohibitory injunction was allowed.
Evidence:
Hence, I am inclined to allow the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established that the petitioner had disposed several vehicles of the school.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Court Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Clarified the limitations on the 1st defendant's decision-making authority regarding school administration.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Irreparable loss and injury
Case Code
Case between Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi vs Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sree Narayana Samskarika Samithi vs Sasidharan.Syamala Mandiram regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 08/08/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won