Case Summary
Southern Phosphate & Mineral filed a suit against AKT Agencies and A.K Thomas. The court heard the case and accepted the compromise terms.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per law.
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise. The plaintiff is also entitled to a refund of court fee as per law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise terms were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
The compromise terms were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The compromise terms were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
The compromise terms were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Perused the terms in compromise, found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence IA No. 01/2025 is allowed. Compromise terms accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Southern Phosphate & Mineral
- Relation
- represented by It's authorised agent and partner, M.B.Sanjeev
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AKT Agencies
- Relation
- represented by It's Proprietor, A.K Thomas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. A.K Thomas
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o. Adakaparambil Kuriakose
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.S Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Babu Shankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Neethu M.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Menino Futo
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antija James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun Shankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akshaya Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Compromise terms accepted and suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence IA No. 01/2025 is allowed. Compromise terms accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise terms in IA No.01/2025 shall form part of decree.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Entitlement to refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee as per law.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs AKT Agencies et al regarding a suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Case Code Year
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs AKT Agencies et al regarding a suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement