Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.59/2016

Case between Sonidas.D. vs Sobhana.G.S. regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-04-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Sonidas.D. and Sheeba Krishnan filed a suit for fixation of boundary and injunction against the defendants Sobhana.G.S., Mangalam, Jayanandan, Rajani, and Sidharthan. The subject matter was settled in a mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed based on a compromise reached in mediation. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fees paid by the Plaintiff
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on a compromise reached in mediation. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of court fees paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties settled the matter in mediation, and the compromise was accepted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sonidas.D.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sheeba Krishnan
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sobhana.G.S.
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mangalam
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayanandan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajani
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sidharthan
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.G.Bindhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. D.S.Chithra
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Somasekaran Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Y.Johnson
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sonidas.D. vs Sobhana.G.S. regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sonidas.D. vs Sobhana.G.S. regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won