Case Summary
The case involves a dispute where the plaintiffs, Soman and others, seek a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, G.Prabhakaran Nadar and others. The defendants have filed a counter claim seeking direction to construct lateral support on the western side of a specified pathway.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner and Taluk Surveyor
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court has appointed an Advocate Commissioner and Taluk Surveyor to ascertain reliefs and properly adjudicate the suit. The application was heard finally and necessary actions were ordered to take place.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it necessary to identify counter claim schedule properties to ensure proper adjudication.
The court found it necessary to identify counter claim schedule properties to ensure proper adjudication.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found it necessary to identify counter claim schedule properties to ensure proper adjudication.
The court found it necessary to identify counter claim schedule properties to ensure proper adjudication.
Supporting Evidence
In order to ascertain the reliefs sought for and for proper adjudication of suit it is necessary to identify the counter claim schedule properties.
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced in open court on this the 17th day of December, 2025. Hence Advocate Clara is appointed as Advocate commissioner and Taluk Surveyor is appointed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Soman
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sumathi
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajesh
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Akhilesh
- Party Age
- 38
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- G.Prabhakaran Nadar
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pradeesh.P
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Anil (Padinjarekota)
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Justin Dillark
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant sought a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
The suit is filed for declaration and permanent prohibitory Injunction.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioners sought direction to construct a lateral support on the western side of the counter claim B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The defendant preferred counter claim seeking direction to construct a lateral support on her western side of counter claim B schedule pathway.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner and Taluk Surveyor to ascertain the reliefs sought for and for proper adjudication of the suit.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2018