OS No.494/1999

Case between Sobhana vs Sivadasini et al regarding delivery of execution petition.

Court

COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-08-22

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sobhana as the decree holder and multiple defendants including Sivadasini and others related to the execution of a court order. The execution petition was filed, and the court confirmed that the delivery had been effected and the order executed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Execution Petition

Final Judgment

The court ruled that the execution petition was satisfied as the delivery of the order had been executed.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution of the order was confirmed by the court.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The execution of the order was confirmed by the court.

Supporting Evidence

Amin reported that order executed.

Judgment Evidence:

Submitted that delivery effected. Amin reported that order executed. EP satisfied. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 22nd day of August, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sobhana
Party Age: 50
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sivadasini
Party Age: 68
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jessy @ Haridasini
Party Age: 63

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Renuka @ Usha
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Renchu
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kuttan @ Ratheesh
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Geetha R
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Jayachandradas. K.K.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification