Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.298/2020

Case between S.M.Sheeba Rani vs Pradeesh, Ajayakumar regarding application for IA

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration
Case Code No.
298
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves S.M.Sheeba Rani as the petitioner and Pradeesh and Ajayakumar as the counter petitioners regarding an application in the court. The court allowed the application for elucidating the disputes between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the interim application and appointed an advocate commissioner to assist in the matter. The applicant is required to deposit specific fees for the commissioner and surveyor.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of advocate commissioner and surveyor
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the interim application and appointed an advocate commissioner to assist in the matter. The applicant is required to deposit specific fees for the commissioner and surveyor.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The applicant made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The applicant made out a prima facie case.
Supporting Evidence
The applicant has made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

The applicant has made out a prima facie case. Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S.M.Sheeba Rani
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeesh
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajayakumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.S.Samesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
C/o Adv.K.Ram Mohan

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The IA is allowed for ascertaining the matters in the application and elucidating the disputes between the parties.
Evidence:
Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the application and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an advocate commissioner and a surveyor to assist the advocate commissioner.
Evidence:
Advocate Smt. Gayathri, C/o Adv.K.Ram Mohan is appointed as advocate commissioner and as Sri.Sajeev.O.S is appointed as the surveyor to assist the advocate commissioner.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction for the applicant to deposit batta to the advocate commissioner and surveyor.
Evidence:
The applicant is directed to deposit batta of Rs.4,500/- to the advocate commissioner and Rs.3000/- to the Surveyor within 30 days.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction for the advocate commissioner to file a report.
Evidence:
The Advocate Commissioner is directed to file the report on or before 09/12/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit while making its decision.
Reference:
Document Type: Written Statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the written statement while making its decision.
Reference:
Document Type: Other Documents
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused other documents while making its decision.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won