Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 430/2025

Case between Sivasankara Pillai et al vs Jagadamma regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sivasankara Pillai and Geethakumari are petitioners seeking a temporary injunction. The case involves a dispute regarding encroachment and creation of a pathway through property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an Ad-Interim Injunction restraining the defendant from encroaching on the plaintiff's property until further notice.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-Interim Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an Ad-Interim Injunction restraining the defendant from encroaching on the plaintiff's property until further notice.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The accompanying affidavit discloses a prima facie case and the court is satisfied that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that if the notice is issued before granting the injunction, the resultant delay would defeat the purpose of granting the injunction. Also, I believe that irreparable injury will be caused to the petitioners, if Ad-Interim Injunction is not granted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the respondent/ defendant and her men are hereby restrained from encroaching into the plaint A schedule property, from creating a way in the south-north direction through the eastern side of plaint A schedule property and from committing any waste therein, until further order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivasankara Pillai
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geethakumari
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jagadamma
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dhanya Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-Interim Injunction is granted restraining the respondent from encroaching into the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
the respondent/ defendant and her men are hereby restrained from encroaching into the plaint A schedule property, from creating a way in the south-north direction through the eastern side of plaint A schedule property and from committing any waste therein, until further order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sivasankara Pillai et al vs Jagadamma regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sivasankara Pillai et al vs Jagadamma regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
KOLLAM
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won