Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.223/2022

Case between Sivalekshmi.A.S vs Riya Travel Solutions et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-11-17
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months
Case Closed
Mon, 11/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sivalekshmi.A.S filed a suit against Riya Travel Solutions and its directors for the recovery of money after being promised an employment visa that was never provided. The plaintiff paid Rs.4,00,000 for the visa which turned out to be false.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.4,32,000 from the defendants with interest. The suit was decided in favor of the plaintiff due to the unchallenged evidence provided.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 4,32,000₹ with interest at the rate of 8% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.4,32,000 from the defendants with interest. The suit was decided in favor of the plaintiff due to the unchallenged evidence provided.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence was sufficiently compelling to establish that the defendants owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence was sufficiently compelling to establish that the defendants owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the oral and documentary evidence from the side of the plaintiff, it is proved that the defendant owed the amount to the plaintiff as claimed in the suit. There is no reason to disbelieve PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 4,32,000₹ with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realisation of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivalekshmi.A.S
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Riya Travel Solutions
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mujeeb Ebrahim
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sameema.A
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement dated 03/04/2021, Copy of reply of mail from Suncor Energy Company dated 07/04/2021, Cheque bearing No.155094 dated 25/09/2021, Return memo report dated 01/10/2021.
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Lijo Roy.L.D.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,32,000/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 4,32,000/- with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants shall pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants regarding the employment visa.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of reply of mail from Suncor Energy Company
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the response from the Suncor Energy company regarding the employment offer, which was found to be false.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque issued by the defendants serves as evidence of their obligation to return the amount paid by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Return Memo Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This report indicates that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Sivalekshmi.A.S vs Riya Travel Solutions et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Sivalekshmi.A.S vs Riya Travel Solutions et al regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 04/03/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won