Case Summary
The plaintiff, Sini Renjith, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and encroaching on her property. The defendants, including Gopakumar and others, are alleged to have attempted illegal encroachments on the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from trespassing onto the plaintiff's properties and allowing the plaintiff to recover costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her case through uncontroverted testimony and documents.
The plaintiff established her case through uncontroverted testimony and documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established her case through uncontroverted testimony and documents.
The plaintiff established her case through uncontroverted testimony and documents.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontroverted testimony of PW1 and Ext.A1 to A3 documents the plaintiff had established his case warranting the grant of relief sought for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed with costs as follows: The defendant is restraining from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties and also restraining them from encroaching upon the B schedule property effecting the present lie and nature of the B schedule and from causing any mischief to the A and B schedule properties.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sini Renjith
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopakumar
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pournami
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Omana Amma
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subash
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- H/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anand
- Party Age
- 45
Plaintiffs Documents
Original deed No.1708/2013, Original tax receipt, Receipt received from Police Station
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Balakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
The defendant is restraining from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties and also restraining them from encroaching upon the B schedule property effecting the present lie and nature of the B schedule and from causing any mischief to the A and B schedule properties.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize the cost of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realise the cost of the suit from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Original deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishes the plaintiff's claim of ownership over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Original tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supports the plaintiff's ownership and tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Receipt received from Police Station
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document shows prior complaint made by the plaintiff regarding the defendants' actions.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Document provides findings relevant to the case as presented by the court.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Rough Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Document provides a visual representation related to the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sini Renjith vs Gopakumar et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sini Renjith vs Gopakumar et al regarding injunction