Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 423/2020

Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Thyagarajan.C et al regarding Prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for a prohibitory injunction, temporary injunction, and declaration under the Code of Civil Procedure. The judgment concludes with the plaintiffs' claims being rejected.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs' claims have been rejected by the court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs' claims have been rejected by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Both side absent represented. No BCF remitted. No petition filed. Plaint rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu.S
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nayana Syam
Party Age
13
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nivedh Syam.S
Party Age
9
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thyagarajan.C
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankarajan
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnankutty
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kanakammal
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankamany Ammal
Party Age
72
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kishore.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shamla.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.S.Geetha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Attingal .S Kumari
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A Sabeer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Prohibitory injunction, temporary injunction and declaration
Evidence:
Both side absent represented. No BCF remitted. No petition filed. Plaint rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Thyagarajan.C et al regarding Prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Thyagarajan.C et al regarding Prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won