Case between Simson P Mathew et al vs Mangomeadows Agriculture Pleasure Land Private Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Simson P Mathew, Thomas Mathew, Mariyamma Kuriakose, and Kala Lakshman, who filed a suit against Mangomeadows Agriculture Pleasure Land Private Ltd and others. The case is about preventing the defendants from illegally disconnecting electricity supply related to a contract for rental of property used for a restaurant and other facilities.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, preventing them from disconnecting electricity supply to their establishments.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Permanent prohibitory injunction from disconnecting electricity supply.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The plaintiffs were granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, preventing them from disconnecting electricity supply to their establishments.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their entitlement to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction based on contractual agreements.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their entitlement to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction based on contractual agreements.

Supporting Evidence

From the unchallenged evidence, it can be seen that plaintiffs are entitled to get a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- a.The defendants and men under them or their agents were restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from disconnecting the electricity supply to the restaurant, swimming pool, dormitory, toilet blocks and home stay run by the plaintiffs without the plaintiffs' permission.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Simson P Mathew
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Thomas Mathew
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Mariyamma Kuriakose
Party Age: 81
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kala Lakshman
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mangomeadows Agriculture Pleasure Land Private Ltd.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mangomeadows Agriculture Pleasure Land Private Ltd.
Party Age: 53
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: N.K.Kurian
Party Age: 53
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lathika Kurian
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

A1 :03.05.2017 Original agreement

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Saju V Joseph
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The defendants and their agents were restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from disconnecting the electricity supply to the restaurant, swimming pool, dormitory, toilet blocks and homestay run by the plaintiffs without the plaintiffs' permission.

Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- a.The defendants and men under them or their agents were restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from disconnecting the electricity supply to the restaurant, swimming pool, dormitory, toilet blocks and home stay run by the plaintiffs without the plaintiffs' permission.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Ext.A1 was the agreement dated 03.05.2017 which outlined the terms regarding the usage of electricity, water, its charges, and related alterations.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Case Classification