Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by Siju Aravindan, filed a suit against the defendants including Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the suit was not pressed and consequently dismissed it.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Siju Aravindan
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mani K.N.
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subeesh M.R
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Viju Divakaran
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Soman Gopalan
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union
- Relation
- Represented by its Chairman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- L. Santosh
- Relation
- Former Administrator
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SNDP Branch No. 1000
- Relation
- represented by its Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.K. Anilkumar
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. Kamalasanan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- Father's not known to the plaintiffs
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M. S Unnikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ardra Krishnan M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Diya Merin Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jose Pallattukaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 28.11.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Plaintiff represented. Defendant No. 1 and Defendant No. 2 exparte. Defendant No. 3 to Defendant No.5 exparte. Not press memo filed. Dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Siju Aravindan et al vs Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Siju Aravindan et al vs Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union et al regarding dismissal of suit