Case Summary
Shini Mol is the plaintiff who filed a suit for realisation of money. The defendant is Rehna.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and did not have representation. The suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shini Mol
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rehna
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Kumar V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shini Mol vs Rehna regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Shini Mol vs Rehna regarding realisation of money