Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.48/2024

Case between Shine vs Shabu regarding settlement in mediation.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Code No.
48
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shine is the plaintiff and Shabu is the defendant in this case. The matter has been settled through mediation with a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement that was reached during mediation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compromise agreement shall form part of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement that was reached during mediation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the agreement found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shine
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabu
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.K.Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sheeba K.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court acknowledged the mediation report which included the terms of the compromise agreement.
Reference:
Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Terms of agreement found to be lawful; compromise agreement shall form part of decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2024

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd vs Mr. Muhammed Raffi et al regarding plaint rejection.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Self Employers Leasing & Finance Ltd vs Mr. M.S. Anilkumar et al regarding a financial dispute.
Additional Munsiff’s Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between B.Dinu vs Bindhu regarding Court Fee Payment
Additional Munsiff’s Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jyothi K Nair vs Geetha K Nair et al regarding Counter Claim
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Soumya Saji vs Balachandran regarding default dismissal
Additional Munsiff’s Court
Civil Suit Dismissed