O.S No . 36/2025

Case between Shilpa Babu vs Shadhin Sha, Shaheed regarding injunction

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-06-21

Duration

Case Closed

Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shilpa Babu is the plaintiff, and Shadhin Sha and Shaheed are the defendants. The case involved an application for an injunction which was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The application for interim relief was dismissed as not pressed and the injunction was lifted.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not pursue the application, resulting in dismissal.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not pursue the application, resulting in dismissal.

Supporting Evidence

The application was not pursued by the plaintiff, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 21.06.2025 and the court on the same day, delivered the following: Dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shilpa Babu
Party Age: 28
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shadhin Sha
Party Age: 30
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shaheed
Party Age: 28
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Vimal Dev
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Giffin Shaloo
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K. A Mohammed Salih
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

IA 2/25 dismissed and ad-interim injunction lifted

Evidence:

IA 2/25 dismissed and ad-interim injunction lifted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification