Case Summary
Shijiraj and Smitha are the plaintiffs, while Jamal is the defendant. The case involves a matter that was resolved through mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been decreed in terms of the compromise reached during mediation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Matter settled in mediation and terms are legally enforceable.
Matter settled in mediation and terms are legally enforceable.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Matter settled in mediation and terms are legally enforceable.
Matter settled in mediation and terms are legally enforceable.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement are legally enforceable.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shijiraj
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smitha
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jamal
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report and compromise petition.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Subhash Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Feba Elma Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjana Lakshmi T.A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shijiraj vs Jamal regarding settlement of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Shijiraj vs Jamal regarding settlement of suit.
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement