Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 6/2025

Case between Shifin Azees vs Shukkoor V.H. regarding temporary and mandatory injunction.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY.
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-0 years 4 days
Case Code No.
6
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shifin Azees filed petitions for temporary prohibitory and mandatory injunctions against his cousin Shukkoor V.H. regarding property and access rights to a road. The plaintiff claims ancestral rights to the property, while the defendant contests the validity of these claims.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court disposed of the petitions IA 01/2025 and IA 02/2025, directing the parties to maintain status quo as per the commissioner's report until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court disposed of the petitions IA 01/2025 and IA 02/2025, directing the parties to maintain status quo as per the commissioner's report until further orders.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/2025 and IA 02/2025 are disposed of. The parties are directed to maintain status quo as noted by the commissioner in C1, C1(a) mahazar and sketch until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shifin Azees
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shukkoor V.H.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ansar Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction to remove the stones unloaded by the defendant.
Evidence:
plaintiff could not establish a prima facie case to be acted upon urgently by passing an interim order of mandatory...injunction.
Relief Type: Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a prohibitory injunction not to obstruct the use of plaint schedule item No.4 and 5 roads.
Evidence:
plaintiff could not establish that he suffers irreversible injury due to the obstruction caused by defendants...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by Adv. Commissioner Ramees Kasim detailing the site.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch filed along with the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won