Case Summary
This case involves Shield pro Safety Products as the plaintiff and M/s. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. as the defendant. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the balance court fee despite multiple chances given by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff did not pay the balance court fee and thus rejected the suit. This was pronounced in open court by the presiding judge.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to comply with court requirements regarding court fee payment.
The plaintiff failed to comply with court requirements regarding court fee payment.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to comply with court requirements regarding court fee payment.
The plaintiff failed to comply with court requirements regarding court fee payment.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 23rd day of August, 2025).
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shield pro Safety Products (A Division of M/s. Ray Constructions Limited)
- Relation
- Represented By
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.K Subramanian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Eswar Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abraham Mathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Subram N.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kavitha S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Susan Maria Bijoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid despite innumerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shield pro Safety Products vs M/s. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. regarding balance court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Shield pro Safety Products vs M/s. Simplex Infrastructure Ltd. regarding balance court fee