Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1898/2025

Case between Shibina R et al vs Mano Justin.L.S regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-11-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Shibina R and Samjith Kumar.K.V., are seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Mano Justin.L.S., to prevent trespassing and waste on the property in question. The court has issued an order to restrain the defendant from certain actions detrimental to the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs against the defendant pending further actions.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing and committing waste.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs against the defendant pending further actions.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/counter petitioner from trespassing and committing waste in the plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shibina R
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Samjith Kumar.K.V.
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mano Justin.L.S
Party Age
58
Relation
C/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Suresh Kumar.C.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and committing waste in the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/counter petitioner from trespassing and committing waste in the plaint A schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit in making its decision.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shibina R et al vs Mano Justin.L.S regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shibina R et al vs Mano Justin.L.S regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Smitha @ Salini vs Soumya. L regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won