Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff, Shemeer, for the realization of money. However, the plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and no steps were taken by the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent and no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shemeer
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Navas
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nihas
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Babitha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Shemeer vs Navas et al regarding Realisation of Money.
Case Code Year
Case between Shemeer vs Navas et al regarding Realisation of Money.