Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP. 137/2025 in RP 13/2025 in RP 38/2023 in OS. No. 5/2022

Case between Sheelakumari vs Mahadevar et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-3 years 1 month
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sheelakumari, the petitioner, seeks to restore a previously dismissed restoration petition related to an ex parte decree against her in a rent-related case. The respondents contend that the petitioner's repeated filings are an abuse of the court process.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition seeking to restore the earlier petition, citing the petitioner's lack of vigilance and the tendency to misuse the legal process.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition seeking to restore the earlier petition, citing the petitioner's lack of vigilance and the tendency to misuse the legal process.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not provide adequate evidence to support her claims of illness preventing her participation in the proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner did not provide adequate evidence to support her claims of illness preventing her participation in the proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
However, here the petitioner is not vigilant in contesting her case. The case proceedings and the number of restoration petitions filed in the case, reveals the same.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheelakumari
Party Age
63
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mahadevar
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dewaswom Board Secretary
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sub Group Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. R. Sajeesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Restoration of RP 13/2025
Evidence:
For the reasons stated above, this Court finds that the petition is only liable to be dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sheelakumari vs Mahadevar et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sheelakumari vs Mahadevar et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 09/26/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Dewaswom Board

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won