Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Sharthakumar and Sharthalal, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Badarudeen and Sanooja. The case was listed for final hearing but neither side appeared in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their failure to produce evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not appear and were not ready to present their case.
The plaintiffs did not appear and were not ready to present their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sharthakumar
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sharthalal
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Badarudeen
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sanooja
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajee Rjappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nizar.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Beena.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff for injunction was dismissed due to their absence.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sharthakumar et al vs Badarudeen et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sharthakumar et al vs Badarudeen et al regarding injunction