Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Sharafudheen and Raseema Beegam Sharafudheen, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Muhammed Ali M. and Jafna Raseema. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was not present during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit for default.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit for default.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, represented. Today posted for ex-parte evidence. Plaintiff not present. Suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit was dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sharafudheen
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raseema Beegam Sharafudheen
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ali M.
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jafna Raseema
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- John George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff filed for injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sharafudheen et al vs Muhammed Ali M. et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sharafudheen et al vs Muhammed Ali M. et al regarding injunction