Case Summary
The plaintiff, Shanavaskhan, represented by Sidhique, filed a suit against the defendant, Smitha. The case involves the rejection of the suit due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite several directions.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not comply with court fee remittance requirements.
The plaintiff did not comply with court fee remittance requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not comply with court fee remittance requirements.
The plaintiff did not comply with court fee remittance requirements.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not remitted inspite of several directions.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shanavaskhan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smitha
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to balance court fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted inspite of several directions. Hence suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shanavaskhan vs Smitha regarding court fee remittance
Case Code Year
Case between Shanavaskhan vs Smitha regarding court fee remittance