Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1022/2022

Case between Shameer. T.S vs Sainalabdeen et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is seeking a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. Both parties were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of both parties and non-remittance of the necessary court fee.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of both parties and non-remittance of the necessary court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. BCF not remitted. On verification seen that BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shameer. T.S
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sainalabdeen
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramla Beevi
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishnapriya. G.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.S. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit is filed by the plaintiff for declaration.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. BCF not remitted. On verification seen that BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction sought by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. BCF not remitted. On verification seen that BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shameer. T.S vs Sainalabdeen et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shameer. T.S vs Sainalabdeen et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won