Case Summary
The plaintiff, Shalini.K, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, who are multiple individuals. The case was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was continuously absent and did not have any representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shalini.K
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jeeju.B
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jeeja.B
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopi
- Party Age
- 75
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajeev
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joy
- Party Age
- 65
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kishore.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shamla.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Manoj Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff sought an injunction.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shalini.K vs Jeeju.B et al regarding Injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Shalini.K vs Jeeju.B et al regarding Injunction.