Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1151/2024

Case between Shakeela et al vs Ushakumari regarding partition

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh S.V
Order Date
2025-10-23
Duration
approximately-18 years 7 months
Case Closed
Thu, 10/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiffs Shakeela, Rejila Kumari, Shamila, Shanooj, and Shibin seeking a partition of the inherited property originally belonging to their deceased father, Kunjan @ Kochappi. The defendant, Ushakumari, did not appear in court to contest the claim.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into six equal shares, giving each party a 1/6 share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property into six equal shares
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into six equal shares, giving each party a 1/6 share.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their entitlement to partition through the undisputed testimony and documentary evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs have proved their case by oral as well as documentary evidence and there is no evidence contrary to that.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, preliminary decree is passed as follows: That the plaint schedule property shall be partitioned into six equal shares.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shakeela
Party Age
67
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rejila Kumari. J.
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shamila
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shanooj
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shibin
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ushakumari
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Gift deed No.183/1972, Death certificate of Kunjan.K, Death certificate of V. Saradha, Copy of death certificate of Shijin, Property tax receipt, Death certificate of Vasanthakumari
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kilimanoor S. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs requested partition of the property.
Evidence:
In the result, preliminary decree is passed as follows: That the plaint schedule property shall be partitioned into six equal shares.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy evidencing the original ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of Kunjan.K evidencing the death of the original owner.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of V. Saradha provided as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of death certificate of Shijin confirming no issues.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Property tax receipt provided as part of the evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of Vasanthakumari included for establishing heirship.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shakeela et al vs Ushakumari regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Shakeela et al vs Ushakumari regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 03/23/2007 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won