Case Summary
This case involves a partition and injunction suit filed by Shaila and others against Sreedharan and others. The parties resolved their disputes through mediation, resulting in a settlement regarding the division of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the disputes regarding the plaint schedule property have been settled through mediation. The suit is decreed according to the terms of the mediated agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a mutual settlement.
The parties reached a mutual settlement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a mutual settlement.
The parties reached a mutual settlement.
Supporting Evidence
The mediator has filed a Memorandum of Agreement signed by all the parties, wherein the disputes relating to the plaint schedule property have been finally settled.
Judgment Evidence:
In view of the above terms of settlement arrived at between the parties in mediation, the suit is decreed accordingly.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shaila
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anju
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aiswarya
- Party Age
- 14
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Akshara
- Party Age
- 7
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aneesh
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreedharan
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhakumary
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mohanan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhosh Kumar
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Syamala
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation agreement, Memorandum of Agreement.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A R Bijoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Charles Devassy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Athira Augustine
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akhila Thampi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S Rashmi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aneesh K S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Farhath Salim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The parties agreed on the settlement of disputes relating to the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In view of the above terms of settlement arrived at between the parties in mediation, the suit is decreed accordingly.
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The parties agreed on the allotment of shares in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The parties have agreed that from out of the plaint schedule property, having a total extent of 4.50 cents (1.82 Ares), and residential building therein, shown as A schedule property in the sketch produced along with the mediation agreement shall be allotted to 1st plaintiff and defendants 9, 10, 11 and the same shall be retained and enjoyed by the 1st plaintiff and defendants 9, 10, 11 as an absolute share of them.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shaila et al vs Sreedharan et al regarding partition and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Shaila et al vs Sreedharan et al regarding partition and injunction.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement