Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 366/2021

Case between S.Geetha vs Sukumari Amma regarding realisation of money

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-05
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 07/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S.Geetha filed a suit against Sukumari Amma for the realization of money. The matter was settled between the parties in a mediation session through a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise made between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Let the compromise form part of the decree and the court fees paid by the Plaintiffs be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise made between the parties and decreed the suit in its terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the compromise.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S.Geetha
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sukumari Amma
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramesh Kumar.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreeraj R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.K.Reghu Palan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Remya Reghu Palan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms based on the compromise reached between the parties.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Court fees paid by the Plaintiffs are to be refunded.
Evidence:
Since the parties settled the matter in mediation session, let the court fees paid by the Plaintiffs be refunded.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between S.Geetha vs Sukumari Amma regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between S.Geetha vs Sukumari Amma regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 07/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won