Case Summary
The plaintiff Senthil Kumar P was absent during the proceedings, while the defendant Sudheer Kumar was present. As the plaintiff was not present, the suit was dismissed for default with costs awarded to the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff, with costs awarded to the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Senthil Kumar P
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudheer Kumar
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hazeem Khan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P T Geevarghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default with cost to defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Senthil Kumar P vs Sudheer Kumar regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Senthil Kumar P vs Sudheer Kumar regarding dismissal for default