Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 535/2022

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Rahul Krishnan et al regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of loan amount due. The defendants denied the loan transaction and claimed that the documents were fabricated.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the principal amount along with reduced interest. The claims of the defendants regarding fabrication were not substantiated.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise from the defendants a sum of 1,64,705/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the principal amount along with reduced interest. The claims of the defendants regarding fabrication were not substantiated.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the loan transaction through documentary evidence and oral testimony.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has produced documentary evidence and oral testimony of PW1. The defendants have not adduced any oral or documentary evidence in support of their allegations.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise from the defendants 1 to 4 jointly and severally a sum of 1,64,705/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Five only) with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahul Krishnan
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun G
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anuraj G
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishnan Nair
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application submitted by the 1st defendant, Demand Promissory Note for Rs. 100000/- executed by the defendants, agreement executed between the plaintiff and the defendants, statement of Accounts of the plaintiff.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Somaraj S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George V Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise from the defendants the balance amount due.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is therefore entitled to realise from the defendants the balance amount of 1,64,705/- together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation, along with the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application submitted by the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Demand Promissory Note for Rs. 100000/- executed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement executed between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Computer printout of the statement of Accounts of the plaintiff in the name of the 1st defendant as on 31.07.2022.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The true copy of Lawyers Notice issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Postal Receipts (4 Nos.) related to the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6 Series
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Acknowledgment Cards signed by the defendants (4 Nos.).
Reference:
Ext.A7 Series
Document Type: Certificate of Incorporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Certificate of incorporation of the plaintiff Company.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Board Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The photocopy of the resolution of the plaintiff Company appointing Subash C K.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Rahul Krishnan et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs Rahul Krishnan et al regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank et al vs Roy V.J. et al regarding Decree
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N.M.Sivarajan vs George Varghese @ Georgekutty, Anil Varghese, Aliyamma regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N.A.George et al vs T.C. Ipe et al regarding declaration and injunction
Principal Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won