Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No. 257/ 2025

Case between Seena vs Shamnad et al regarding getting a temporary injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner Seena is seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Shamnad and Sumina regarding property ownership and possession. This case involves disputes over familial property in Thiruvananthapuram District.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered both parties to maintain the status-quo regarding the property in dispute until the case is resolved. No costs were assigned.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Both parties are directed to maintain status-quo as reported by the advocate commissioner.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered both parties to maintain the status-quo regarding the property in dispute until the case is resolved. No costs were assigned.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case for the temporary injunction based on ownership and previous court rulings.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established a prima facie case for the temporary injunction based on ownership and previous court rulings.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the second respondent is having no right to encroach into the petition schedule property. The learned counsel prayed for allowing the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is disposed as follows: 1. Both parties are directed to maintain the status-quo as reported by the advocate commissioner in Ext.C1 and C1(a) till the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Seena
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shamnad
Party Age
40
Relation
H/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumina
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of settlement Deed No. 1554/ 2017, Tax receipt dated 11/12/2025, Certified copy of judgment in OS 470/ 2017, Possession Certificate dated 2/07/2025, Receipt No R-G010103- 25001293 dated 01/07/2025.
Defendants Documents
Copy of settlement deed No. 1811/ 2013, Tax receipt dated 25/10/2017, Copy of Sale deed No. 2222/ 2009, Copy of plaint in O.S. 470/ 2017, Copy of written statement in O.S. 470/ 2017.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vivek. R. M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Sabeer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner sought a temporary injunction to prevent respondents from trespassing on her property.
Evidence:
Hence point nos.1 to 3 are found accordingly.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petitioner and respondents were to bear their own costs.
Evidence:
Hence this point is found accordingly.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the petitioner's claim of ownership and possession of the petition schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the petitioner's continuous ownership and legal standing by proving tax remittance.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to a previous case that is referenced, indicating that the petitioner had a prior successful outcome.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates the petitioner's recognized possession of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt further establishes the connection of the petitioner to the property through local governance.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is used by the respondent to contest the petitioner's claim of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is presented to show the respondent's claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document establishes the basis of property ownership claimed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document highlights the context of a previous legal action pertinent to the ongoing dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Written Statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document presents the defendant's stance and counterclaims against the petitioner's assertions.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Police Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document illustrates the legal steps taken by the respondent concerning allegations of encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document contains the sworn statements made by the defendant to support their claims.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document provides findings from an official investigation related to the property disputes.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This settlement deed is mentioned to establish property rights claimed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document continues to support the defendant's argument regarding ownership and rights.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document provides the court's commissioner's findings relevant to the property status.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document offers a visual representation of the property in question, aiding the court's understanding.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Seena vs Shamnad et al regarding getting a temporary injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Seena vs Shamnad et al regarding getting a temporary injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won