OS. No. 252/2022

Case between Seema et al vs Earnest Baby.W et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court

Munsiff Court, Kollam

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-08-25

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence. There was no representation from the plaintiff.

Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.

Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was absent and made no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Seema
Party Age: 43
Relation: D/o.Late.William

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Reena. B
Party Age: 40
Relation: D/o.Late.William

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kisinger.W
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o.Late.William

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Earnest Baby.W
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o.Late.William

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Stalin.W
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o.Late.William

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Obeen.W
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o.Late.William

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: OMANAKUTTAN. A.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: R.R. SAJEESH
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Permanent prohibitory injunction sought by the plaintiff.

Evidence:

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction u/S 26 u/O VII R.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification