Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 305/2015

Case between The Secretary vs Mohammed Basheer Mannarathodiyil et al regarding default in depositing batta

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2016-10-24
Duration
1 year, 1 month, 6 days
Case Code No.
305
Case Closed
Mon, 10/24/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Secretary filed a case against Mohammed Basheer Mannarathodiyil and others for default in depositing batta. The court dismissed the Execution Petition due to the petitioner's failure to deposit batta despite repeated chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Execution Petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to deposit batta.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of Execution Petition
Case Type
Execution Petition - Dismissal
Final Judgment
No
The Execution Petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to deposit batta.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Even after repeated chances were given petitioner failed to deposit batta. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohammed Basheer Mannarathodiyil
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ummer Farookh Palappetti
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noorul Ameen Pottassery
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P.Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Basheer Mannarathodiyil: Advocate
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate for Ummer Farookh Palappetti
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate for Noorul Ameen Pottassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of Execution Petition
Evidence:
Even after repeated chances were given petitioner failed to deposit batta. Hence EP is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition - Dismissal
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 09/30/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/24/2016 - 12:00
From
Sat, 10/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Mon, 10/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Punnekkat Thanka regarding Decree
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Execution Proceeding Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary vs Koya et al regarding loan closure
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary, The Kottakkal Service Co-operative Society vs Ramshi regarding execution petition dismissal
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition - Dismissal Defendant Won