Case Summary
The decree holder is the Secretary of a cooperative bank, while the judgment debtors include Enuddeen and others. The case pertains to an execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition filed by the decree holder was dismissed as the necessary documents were not produced.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder did not produce the required documents.
The decree holder did not produce the required documents.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder did not produce the required documents.
The decree holder did not produce the required documents.
Supporting Evidence
Batta not produced.
Judgment Evidence:
EP Stands. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Secratary
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Enuddeen
- Party Age
- 53
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yahu Mannil
- Party Age
- 48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jiji.JD
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Secratary vs Enuddeen et al regarding EP 346/2018.
Case Code Year
Case between Secratary vs Enuddeen et al regarding EP 346/2018.