Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 112/2024

Case between Sebin A. Paul vs Suchithra Aravindakshan regarding a compromise agreement.

Court
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-04-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sebin A. Paul filed a suit against Suchithra Aravindakshan regarding a compromise agreement. The court accepted the compromise and decreed the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise agreement and decreed the suit as per its terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund court fee as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise agreement and decreed the suit as per its terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled through a lawful compromise agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Compromise agreement filed accepted being lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

As per the terms of the compromise agreement suit stands decreed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sebin A. Paul
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suchithra Aravindakshan
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise agreement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kapilkrishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anas C.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramya Velayudhan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Santhoshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit stands decreed as per the terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
As per the terms of the compromise agreement suit stands decreed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Refund court fee as per law.
Evidence:
Refund court fee as per law.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
No costs.
Evidence:
No costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the compromise agreement which was filed and deemed lawful.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sebin A. Paul vs Suchithra Aravindakshan regarding a compromise agreement.
Case Code Year
Case between Sebin A. Paul vs Suchithra Aravindakshan regarding a compromise agreement.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won