Case Summary
Sathan Singh filed a suit for a decree of permanent injunction against Raja Vignesh. The plaintiff was absent for the hearing, resulting in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sathan Singh
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raja Vignesh
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Vipin Mohan Unnithan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lekha R.Pattathanam
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Case between Sathan Singh vs Raja Vignesh regarding permanent injunction > Case advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Decree of permanent injunction claimed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sathan Singh vs Raja Vignesh regarding permanent injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sathan Singh vs Raja Vignesh regarding permanent injunction