Case Summary
This suit is filed by the Plaintiff for permanent and mandatory injunction. Both sides were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of both parties. There was no representation from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sasikala
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R. Sundaresan
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sumangalan. S
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudheesh. S
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sufil. S
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sobha
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arun Sivasankara Pillai
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh Kumar & K. Viniu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Binoy Bal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent and mandatory injunction requested by the Plaintiff.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasikala et al vs Sobha et al regarding permanent and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sasikala et al vs Sobha et al regarding permanent and mandatory injunction