Case Summary
Sasidharan is the plaintiff and Shyam Mohan is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence. There was no representation from either party.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff remained absent though listed for evidence of plaintiff. Name called, no representation. No proof affidavit also seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sasidharan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyam Mohan
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Mohammed Rafeeq
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gikkee Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's continued absence.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasidharan vs Shyam Mohan regarding non-prosecution.
Case Code Year
Case between Sasidharan vs Shyam Mohan regarding non-prosecution.