Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1630/2014

Case between Sasidharan et al vs Mani regarding execution petition

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sasidharan and Leena are the plaintiffs seeking execution of a decree against Mani, the defendant. The court has closed the execution petition after finding that nothing further remains to be executed in the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was closed as the court found that there was nothing further to be executed in the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed as the court found that there was nothing further to be executed in the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The property was measured and the Commission Report was filed in accordance with the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The property was measured and the Commission Report was filed in accordance with the decree.
Supporting Evidence
The property is measured and Commission Report is already filed. Nothing further remains to be executed in this decree.

Judgment Evidence:

Though objection is filed in Commission Report, the same is not tenable as it is seen from the Commission Report that the property is measured in accordance with Clause (1) of decree and also in view of Clause (2) of the decree which mandates the parties to accept the sketch.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasidharan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leena
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mani
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.C Sajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jeemon R. Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. K Dileepan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Karthik Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referenced the Commission Report regarding the property measurement in accordance with the decree.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasidharan et al vs Mani regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sasidharan et al vs Mani regarding execution petition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won