Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 566/2022

Case between Sasi Roy Davison vs P. Mohanan Nair et al regarding partition

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration
approximately-3 years 18 days
Case Closed
Tue, 08/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sasi Roy Davison filed a suit for partition against P. Mohanan Nair and others. The plaintiff claims entitlement to one share of the property previously owned by Henry Abiya.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed. The plaint schedule property shall be divided into two equal shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed. The plaint schedule property shall be divided into two equal shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Defendants admitted the plaint claim which stood proved.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Defendants admitted the plaint claim which stood proved.
Supporting Evidence
In view of the fact that the defendants have admitted the plaint claim, the plaint claim stands proved and plaintiffs are entitled to get the decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows; 1) The plaint schedule property shall be divided by metes and bounds into 2 equal shares and the plaintiff is entitled to one such share.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasi Roy Davison
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Mohanan Nair
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha Raveendranath
Party Age
64
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha Peethambaran
Party Age
62
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. Praveen
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.Pradeep
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Anil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anwar Ali A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Srinath Girish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A preliminary decree for partition was granted.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows;

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Document of Joint-I SRO
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the original ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
Document No.312/1935
Document Type: Land Tribunal Document
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document assigns jenm rights to the co-owners of the property.
Reference:
Document No.2698 of 1978
Document Type: Land Tribunal Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is significant for establishing ownership rights over item No.2 of the property.
Reference:
Document No.790/1978

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasi Roy Davison vs P. Mohanan Nair et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Sasi Roy Davison vs P. Mohanan Nair et al regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 07/18/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won