Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.272/2022

Case between Saraswathi vs Sheeja et al regarding easement right over pathway

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Fri, 11/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Saraswathi, who is seeking a declaration of her easement right over a pathway and a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants are family members who are allegedly obstructing access to this pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared that the plaintiff has easement rights over the pathway and issued a permanent injunction against the first two defendants from obstructing it.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing plaint C schedule pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared that the plaintiff has easement rights over the pathway and issued a permanent injunction against the first two defendants from obstructing it.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her easement rights through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established her easement rights through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiff, plaintiff has established that she is entitled to get a decree of declaration of easement right by prescription over plaint C schedule pathway and a permanent prohibitory injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows:- It's hereby declared that the plaintiff is having easement right by prescription over plaint C schedule pathway.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saraswathi
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheeja
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raji
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeesh
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Release deed No.151/2012, Release deed No.667/2012, Release deed No.974/2012, Tax receipt No. KL01020902022/2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Praveen. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of plaintiff's easement right over plaint C schedule pathway
Evidence:
It's hereby declared that the plaintiff is having easement right by prescription over plaint C schedule pathway.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing plaint C schedule pathway
Evidence:
The first and second defendants are restrained by way of a permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing plaint C schedule pathway and committing any act of waste therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of release deed No.151/2012 dated 24.01.2012 of S.R.O, Kadakkavoor
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of release deed No.667/2012 dated 23.05.2012 of S.R.O, Kadakkavoor
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of release deed No.974/2012 dated 25.07.2012 of S.R.O, Kadakkavoor
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 25.05.2022
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report prepared and submitted by Adv. Commissioner Smt. Aswathi M. Anand
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch prepared and submitted by Adv. Commissioner Smt. Aswathi M. Anand
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Obstruction of easement rights
Case Code
Case between Saraswathi vs Sheeja et al regarding easement right over pathway
Case Code Year
Case between Saraswathi vs Sheeja et al regarding easement right over pathway

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 07/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won