Case Summary
The plaintiff Santhosh.M filed a suit against the defendant Ajiraj for a permanent prohibitory injunction. However, both parties were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as both the plaintiff and the defendant were absent during the court proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented. Plaintiff called absent, no representation on his part. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhosh.M @ Mony Santhosh
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajiraj
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh Kumar.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Raj.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sukul Khadar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Johnson Pius
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction sought by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction u/s 26 u/O VII R 1 to 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Santhosh.M @ Mony Santhosh vs Ajiraj regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Santhosh.M @ Mony Santhosh vs Ajiraj regarding permanent prohibitory injunction