Case Summary
Sanoj is the plaintiff who filed a suit for the realization of money. The defendant is Sisha S. Rusiyalu.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and there was no representation. The court rejected the plaint due to the BCF not being remitted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sanoj
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sisha S. Rusiyalu
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mathew Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajayan D.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff filed for realization of money.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sanoj vs Sisha S. Rusiyalu regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Sanoj vs Sisha S. Rusiyalu regarding realisation of money