Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1195 /2014

Case between Sankaran Nair et al vs Sathy regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
Case Code No.
1195
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Sankaran Nair and Sanaja Kumari filed a suit against defendant Sathy. The court ultimately dismissed the suit as not pressed based on the plaintiff's memo.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed following the plaintiff's submission. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed following the plaintiff's submission. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sankaran Nair
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanaja Kumari
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathy
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in OP(C) No. 755/2021 dated 14-03-2025.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Bahuleyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M. Kesavankutty Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the original petition as not pressed. The plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the Judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in OP(C) No. 755/2021 as part of the decision-making process.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won