Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.142/2025

Case between Sanju Paul Kadavil vs Vince Martin regarding monetary recovery

Court
Additional Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt.Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
Case Code No.
142
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sanju Paul Kadavil filed a petition against Vince Martin for the recovery of a loan amounting to Rs. 10,00,000 along with interest. The case involves allegations of dishonored cheques and claims regarding a promissory note.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for attachment before judgment and ordered the defendants to furnish security for the plaint claim amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional order of attachment before judgment for Rs. 10,00,000
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for attachment before judgment and ordered the defendants to furnish security for the plaint claim amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case of dishonored cheques and the need for attachment to secure the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case of dishonored cheques and the need for attachment to secure the claim.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner in his affidavit clearly stated that he got reliable information that the respondent is trying to alienate the assets.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: Defendants/counter petitioners to furnish security for the plaint claim amount of Rs.10,00,000/- within a period of 30 days in the meanwhile a conditional order of attachment before judgment passed so as to attach 2.7 ares property out of the plaint schedule property in Veiloor Village, Thiruvananthapuram District.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanju Paul Kadavil
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vince Martin
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note dated 02.06.2023, Original Cheque dated 02.01.2025, Statement dated 14.01.2025, Notice dated 18.01.2025
Defendants Documents
Statement dated 22.11.2023, Copy of Caveat No.21/25, Copy of OS.120/25

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Hari.S.Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.J.Jayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Attachment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Attachment of property before judgment due to risk of alienation.
Evidence:
The court views that the petition can be allowed due to the potential risk of disposing off the property by the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the debt owed to the plaintiff by the counter petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Instrument of repayment that was dishonored.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notification of cheque dishonor.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The counter petitioner's response denying the transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence submitted by the counter petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Copy of Caveat
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documentation related to a legal safeguard filed by the counter petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Copy of OS
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Related to another pending legal case involving the counter petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.B3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won