Case Summary
The plaintiff Sandya K filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant Rasheeda. On the hearing date, the court noted that the matter had been settled and a compromise was filed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as a compromise was reached between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Parties reached a settlement agreement.
Parties reached a settlement agreement.
Why Defendant Won:
Parties reached a settlement agreement.
Parties reached a settlement agreement.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent represented. Submit that matter settled, compromise filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed. (Pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 11th day of August, 2025)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sandya K
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rasheeda
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E Nishad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Srarath S.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bobin V.L
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction u/s 26 u/O VII R.1 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sandya K vs Rasheeda regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sandya K vs Rasheeda regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement