Case Summary
This case involves a plaintiff named Sandrakrishna C seeking a temporary injunction against multiple defendants including Sajeev, Abhilash, Manoj, Madhu, Anil Kumar, and Ratheesh. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sandrakrishna C
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajeev
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abhilash
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoj
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Madhu
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anil Kumar
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ratheesh
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.Karthikalal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Temporary injunction sought by the plaintiff
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sandrakrishna C vs Sajeev et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sandrakrishna C vs Sajeev et al regarding temporary injunction