Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction

Case Summary

This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against respondents Arun Kumar Karerat and Sreejith Janardhanan Pillai. The injunction aims to prevent the respondents from encumbering or selling the plaint schedule properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from encumbering, selling, or damaging the plaint schedule properties until further orders. This is to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Temporary injunction against defendants

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

No

The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from encumbering, selling, or damaging the plaint schedule properties until further orders. This is to prevent irreparable injury to the petitioners.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners made out a prima facie case showing that irreparable injury would be caused if the injunction were not granted.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents from encumbering, selling, inducting strangers into the plaint schedule properties and from demolishing the internal walls and other structures in the plaint B schedule apartment until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Samson T George
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Babu Mathew @ Parayil Mathew Babu
Party Age: 67
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Arun Kumar Karerat
Party Age: 59
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sreejith Janardhanan Pillai
Party Age: 33
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Affidavit as well as records

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P Suresh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K A Shaji Mathew
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Riyan Augustine Shaji
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Amal M
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Enoch David Simon Joel
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The petitioners requested a temporary injunction to prevent the respondents from taking actions that could harm the property.

Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents from encumbering, selling, inducting strangers into the plaint schedule properties and from demolishing the internal walls and other structures in the plaint B schedule apartment until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

The affidavit was reviewed by the court to support the petition for temporary injunction.

Reference:

Document Type: Interim Injunction Order

Submitted By: Court