OS. No.691/2020

Case between Salim vs Rashudheen et al regarding injunction

Court

MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-10-04

Duration

approximately-5 years

Case Closed

Sat, 10/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of filed evidence or application.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and did not provide necessary documentation.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was absent, represented during the hearing but did not file any affidavit or application.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Salim
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rashudheen
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Shahida Beevi
Party Age: 37
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lai Salahudheen
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muneera
Party Age: 40
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Panambil S. Jayakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: V.Sugathan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: R. Geetha
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Nisha L. Prakash
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Plaintiff filed for injunction but the suit was dismissed for default due to absence.

Evidence:

Plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification